Federal Judge Dismisses Trump Campaign Lawsuit in Pennsylvania

Federal Judge Dismisses Trump Campaign Lawsuit in Pennsylvania

The suit was one of the last remaining legal avenues for the campaign in the state; judge says accusations were ‘unsupported by evidence’

A federal judge on Saturday dismissed a Trump campaign lawsuit that accused Pennsylvania officials of enabling voter fraud, opening the way for the state to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s victory and dealing a blow to the president’s narrowing legal options.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann said the Trump campaign had used the lawsuit to attempt to discard legally cast votes, rejecting arguments made by President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, that Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot procedures presented the opportunity for widespread voter fraud.

In his ruling, Judge Brann concluded the lawsuit was marred by “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations…unsupported by evidence.”

“In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state,” wrote Judge Brann, an Obama appointee who has been a member of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group.

President Trump’s legal advisers said Saturday night that they disagreed with Judge Brann’s opinion and would make an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in hopes of quickly getting a hearing from the U.S. Supreme Court.